Paul O. Dillon, Attorney at Law

How Parents and Adult Children Talk about Money and Aging

If you thought it was hard to talk with your children about sex, try talking with them about money and death. Americans generally steer clear of talking about death and money. Nevertheless, these conversations are necessary, according to a recent article, “Let’s talk about money and death: Why aging parents and their adult children should have ‘the talk,’” from MarketWatch. Sharing information about finances and end-of-life wishes can prevent resentment or stress before a crisis and gives everyone involved peace of mind.

If an estate plan has been created and financial and tax planning accomplished, but the adult children aren’t told a plan exists, there may be general worry over decades as parents age. What will happen when they die? Will the siblings know what to do? Who will be in charge? A family meeting to discuss the plan and the parents’ wishes can address these issues.

This is especially important for members of Generation X (Americans born between 1965 and 1980). This cohort has the most assets, may deal with a significant wealth transfer and often cares for its children and aging parents.

Start by putting together an agenda for the family meeting. Understand that there may need to be more than one meeting, since there is so much ground to cover. Long-term Care planning, the current status of the parent’s living situation and plans for a possible move to a continuing care facility are just the start. Do the parents have an estate plan and documents like a Power of Attorney, Healthcare Proxy, Advanced Care Directive and the like?

Money can be an emotional conversation, especially if there are disparities in the sibling’s financial status. Parents are often extremely reticent to share information about their net worth, sometimes because they don’t want their children to lose incentive to work, and in other situations because they are embarrassed about not having enough money to sustain them through their later elder years.

Having a neutral third party in the meeting, like an estate planning attorney, can be helpful when emotions are running high. Holding a family meeting in a law office may sound formal. However, having a professional on hand who can clarify estate, financial and tax matters may help keep the conversation focused. If the estate planning attorney works with a therapist or geriatric specialist who facilitates family discussions, they may be able to help the family move past the emotions of anticipated grief into productive, concrete planning.

Confronting the realities of mortality and money is difficult even in the best of circumstances. Nevertheless, with the support of skilled professionals, a focus on care and the creation of a no-judgment zone, the family will be able to help each other as they prepare for the future.

Reference: MarketWatch (March 23, 2024) “Let’s talk about money and death: Why aging parents and their adult children should have ‘the talk’”

Why is a Will Important?

Everyone knows what a Last Will and Testament is. However, many Americans don’t have one, says a recent article from The News-Enterprise, “Why everyone needs a will.” Many people think they don’t need a will until they retire, are nearing death, or are concerned about the cost. However, the truth is, any adult with mental capacity needs to have a will. Every parent needs a will. And anyone who owns anything, whether a car, home, or bank account, needs a will.

Anyone who is married or owns assets with named beneficiaries or joint ownership still needs a will, which can be confusing to some people. Here’s why everyone needs a will.

Owning assets together, as in joint ownership, or owning accounts titled with another person’s name, as in payable-on-death, or owning assets with named beneficiaries, protect those specific assets from going through probate. However, everything else in the estate still must go through probate.

With no will in place, the state statute determines who will receive any probate assets. However, even with all assets assigned to beneficiaries or joint owners, if there is a lawsuit over the death, the estate will receive assets from the lawsuit, and money will be distributed according to state intestacy laws if there is no will.

When property is held in joint ownership, when the second owner dies, who will receive the property? In the same way, accounts with payable-on-death beneficiaries must consider what will occur if the beneficiary should die first. The property or assets may end up in probate anyway. If there’s no will, the state’s intestacy laws will determine who receives the property.

Another common question about wills concerns the need to work with an experienced estate planning attorney. Here’s the big problem: if the will is flawed because the person or online platform does not comply with the state’s laws of how a will must be created and executed, the will may easily be deemed invalid. If this happens, there’s no way to fix the problem, and the person’s estate is subject to state statutes.

There’s no reason not to speak with an estate planning attorney to learn how different property types pass from one person to another, discuss the tax issues in estate planning, including how inheritance can impact beneficiaries and what happens if unexpected events occur. Unintended consequences are expensive for surviving spouses and heirs and are more likely to result if no professional guidance is involved.

Even if you have a trust, you still need a will. Trusts need to be funded for them to work, and sometimes, assets are left out of them. A provision can be included in the will to “pour over” any assets into an established trust to protect against assets going through probate.

Parents need wills, so their minor children can be protected. The will is the legal mechanism whereby parents name a guardian to raise minor children. If there’s no will, the court appoints a guardian. This is a decision most parents would prefer to make themselves.

Reference: The News-Enterprise (March 2, 204) “Why everyone needs a will”

Everyone Needs an Estate Plan

A comprehensive estate plan offers many benefits, from protecting surviving spouses, ensuring one’s wishes for medical care are followed, or reducing estate taxes. While the primary focus of an estate plan is different for every individual, reports the article “A good estate plan important” from The Record-Courier, there are common benefits for everyone concerned.

A good estate plan protects individuals and families before death by protecting assets for the use of an incapacitated person by placing them in a trust managed by a responsible trustee. An estate plan allows you to designate an agent to make health and financial decisions during incapacity. It will enable you to develop a retirement strategy by assessing and organizing your assets and financial needs.

With an estate plan in place, a deceased person’s family is spared the burden of making difficult decisions, including when or if to withhold life support treatment or how to handle a loved one’s remains. These decisions can be made in advance through the estate plan, so the family knows their loved one’s wishes, making a difficult time a little less stressful.

Clearly and transparently expressing goals and wishes for the final distribution of one’s estate removes the emotions and potential conflict associated all too often with the division of money and other assets, including personal effects.

An organized and funded estate plan ensures that the family is protected. If the right steps are taken, there will be enough money to pay bills and other living expenses, financial affairs will be organized, and accounts will be accessible to loved ones immediately without waiting for probate and the court’s permission. Guardians for minor children are appointed, and uncertainty needs not make their grief and trauma worse. Special needs children and adults are protected with a trust to supplement their needs in addition to government benefits, and the education of young adults is planned for with a college fund.

A comprehensive estate plan prepared in tandem with a business succession plan is crucial for business owners. Without a succession plan and estate plan, the business can fall apart after the departure or demise of the business owners. An estate plan can provide the rules and instructions for the business to transition to a new owner and ensure continuity.

A good estate plan also addresses tax planning. There are more than a few tax reduction strategies to minimize the taxes on a decedent’s estate, making more money available to the surviving family.

For philanthropically minded people, the estate planning process can also support charitable causes, creating a legacy and inspiring other family members to think beyond their own needs and wants to serve their communities.

It’s never too early to begin preparing an estate plan—life is unpredictable, and there’s no downside to being ready for whatever may come next.

Reference: The Record-Courier (Aug. 27, 2023) “A good estate plan important”

Don’t Shrink Your Estate with Last Minute Tax Planning

In the best-case scenario, you’d start talking with your estate planning attorney early on about your overall goals and the various tools available to minimize tax liability and transfer wealth to the next generation. Whether your estate is modest or significant, the article “A Recipe for Risk—Last-Minute Tax Planning for Estates” from The Legal Intelligencer explains how a last-minute plan failed on a grand scale. A recent memorandum opinion from the U.S. Tax Court provides a cautionary tale.

Howard Moore owned a large amount of property and ran a successful farm. He was admitted to the hospital late in 2004, was discharged to hospice and told he only had six months to live. He created an estate plan that included a family limited partnership (FLP), a living trust, a charitable lead annuity trust, a trust for the adult children, a management trust that acted as the general partner of the family limited partnership and an “Irrevocable Trust No. 1” that was created to act as a conduit for the transfer of funds from the FLP to a charitable foundation.

The primary focus of the plan was to transfer the farm to a living trust and then to transfer 80% of the farm property to the FLP. The management trust was to serve as a partner to the FLP, with the living trust owning almost all the limited partnership interests and with each of the decedent’s children owning a 1% partnership interest. The FLP was to offer protection against liabilities from the use of pesticides, potential bad marriages, creditors and the fact that the family was a bit dysfunctional and would need to work together to manage the FLP. The FLP had many transfer restrictions and the limited partners were not given any rights to participate in business management or operational decisions regarding the FLP.

The trust known as “Irrevocable Trust No. 1” was nominally funded at the time of the decedent’s death and received funding from the FLP. Those funds, in turn, were transferred to the charitable trust to gain a charitable deduction by the estate. Just before he died, Moore used FLP funds to make large transfers to his children that were designated as loans. He also made outright gifts to the children and to one grandchild.

The estate filed an estate tax return and a gift tax return after Moore’s death. The IRS issued a notice of deficiency for nearly $6.4 million and the case went to tax court. The U. S. Tax Court agreed with the IRS’ findings. The defense of the estate plan, the tax court maintained, was form over substance and the only reason for the estate plan and the numerous transactions was to save estate taxes.

There were a lot of hurdles in this case, in addition to the short time period for the estate plan to have been created. At the time of the decedent’s hospitalization, the sale of the farm to a neighbor was being negotiated. A contract to sell the farm was executed with days of transferring it to the living trust. There were numerous transfers and distributions made between trusts and the FLP, and the court concluded that all decisions about the FLP after its formation were made unilaterally by the decedent. An FLP is supposed to function as a true partnership. Many other issues and errors occurred in the rush to have this estate structured in such a short period of time.

Had Moore engaged in planning five or ten years earlier, there would have been time to create a plan in which both the substance and execution of the plan were sound and the family would have been able to save millions of dollars in taxes. By waiting until his death was imminent, the plan attempted to establish transfer requirements without the opportunity to execute them properly.

Reference: The Legal Intelligencer (May 18, 2020) “A Recipe for Risk—Last-Minute Tax Planning for Estates”

C19 UPDATE: Employers Now May Help Employees with Tax-Free Direct Disaster Relief Assistance

As the coronavirus pandemic emergency unfolds, it’s clear that increasing numbers of employees will likely suffer financial impacts … from quarantines, illnesses, workplace closings, etc. President Trump’s declaration of a national emergency on March 13 now allows employers to make direct disaster-relief payments to assist employees affected by the virus.

These types of payments are not treated as income/wages to the employees and are deductible to the employer as ordinary and necessary business expenses. There is no specific cap on the amount of assistance that may be provided to an employee other than it must be “reasonable and necessary” and must not be for an expense reimbursable by the employee’s insurance.

Section 139 of the Internal Revenue Code, allows that a “qualified disaster relief payment” of any amount may be paid to reimburse or pay reasonable and necessary personal, family, living or funeral expenses (not otherwise compensated for by insurance) incurred because of a “qualified disaster.” The term “qualified disaster” includes a federally declared disaster or emergency under the Stafford Act. Accordingly, due to the Declaration, Coronavirus is now a “qualified disaster” for Section 139 purposes, so disaster relief may be provided to employees on a tax-free basis (assuming all the requirements of Section 139 are satisfied).

As always check with your CPA or attorney before implementing any tax planning strategy for your business.

Read more at The National Review, Coronavirus National Emergency Declaration Permits Employers to Offer Tax-Favored Financial Assistance to Employees, March 14, 2020

The High Cost of Medicare Mistakes

A 68-year-old woman knew that she had to sign up at age 65 for Medicare Part A for hospital care and Part B for outpatient care, since she did not have employer provided health insurance from an employer with 20 or more employees. She knew also that if she did not have health insurance from an employer and didn’t sign up immediately, she’d face a penalty with higher Part B and Part D premiums for the rest of her life when eventually she did sign up, reports Forbes in the article “Beware Medicare’s Part B Premium Penalty And Surcharge Traps.”

Here’s where it got sticky: she thought that Medicare provided an eight-month special enrollment period after one job ended to apply penalty free. She is employed on a sporadic basis, so she thought she had a window of time. Between the ages of 65 and 68, she had several jobs with large employers, and was never out of work for more than eight months.

She was out of work for 25 months total between ages 65 and 68, when she was not enrolled in Medicare. She thought that since she was never out of work for more than eight months, she didn’t have to sign up until she officially stopped working and would then enroll penalty free in traditional Medicare Parts A, B, and D.

She had read information on the Medicare website and her interpretation of the information was wrong. It was a costly mistake.

In determining whether you need to permanently pay a Medicare Part B penalty, Medicare counts up all the months between age 65 and the month you first enroll in Part B, even if you have a job with a large employer with no gaps in employment for more than eight months.

She got hit with a 20% lifetime Medicare Part B premium penalty. For every 12 months that you’re not covered by Medicare B after reaching 65 and before you enroll, the penalty is an additional 10%. And making things worse, she was hit with a Medicare Part B penalty based on the cumulative (not consecutive, which is an important difference) 25 months that she went without credible prescription drug coverage.

This is the sort of problem that does not self-resolve or get better over time. In this case, another mistake in timing is going to hurt her. She sold some assets and realized a capital gain in 2018, which increased her Modified Adjusted Gross Income (MAGI). In 2020, she’s going to have to pay the Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount (IRMAA). If your MAGI, two years before the current year, is less than $87,000, you are exempt from IRMAA in the current year. Her cost: $1,735.20 more this year. Had she instead realized those capital gains over the course of several years, her 2018 MAGI might not have crossed the $87,000 threshold. Most people are not aware of the IRMAA and take capital gains in larger amounts than they need.

This is a harsh lesson to learn, at a time in life when there’s not a lot of flexibility or time to catch up. Talking with an estate planning lawyer about Medicare and about tax planning, as well as having an estate plan created, would have spared this woman, and countless others, from the harsh consequences of her mistakes.

Reference: Forbes (Jan. 29, 2020) “Beware Medicare’s Part B Premium Penalty And Surcharge Traps”

Do Unmarried Couples Need Estate Planning?

A couple that has no intention of ever getting married should know that they won’t get the automatic rights and protections that legally wed spouses get, particularly when it comes to death. Therefore, unmarried couples must make a concerted effort to cover all the bases, says CNBC’s recent article entitled “Here’s what happens to your partner if you’re not married and you die.”

The number of unmarried couples who live together reached 18 million in 2016, a 29% increase from 14 million in 2007, according to the Pew Research Center. Among adults age 50 and older, the increase was 75% with roughly 4 million cohabiting in 2016, compared to 2.3 million in 2007.

These couples still face some key differences from their married counterparts. For example, there’s no filing federal taxes as a couple, and if an employer allows health insurance for a partner, the amount the company contributes is taxable to the employee, rather than being tax-free for a spouse.

End-of-life considerations also need attention. Unmarried couples can sign some legal documents that will dictate what happens, if one of them either becomes incapacitated or passes away, which is a type of estate plan.

If you die without a will or intestate, the state probate court will decide how your assets are distributed. A will by itself also won’t address everything. If you want to make sure your tax-advantaged retirement accounts — like your Roth IRA and 401(k) plans — go to your partner, make sure that individual is the designated beneficiary on those accounts. Even if your will says otherwise, whoever’s listed as the beneficiaries on those accounts will get the money. It’s the same for insurance policies and annuities.

If both partner’s names are on checking, savings or investment accounts, the account will pass directly to the surviving partner. However, for an account with only one partner’s name on it, ask the bank about the appropriate form to be completed, so the money is left directly to the surviving partner. This is what’s called a transfer-on-death or payable-on-death designation. Without this designation, the assets will end up in probate and distributed either in accordance with the will or intestacy state laws.

Regardless of how the mortgage is paid or whose name is on the loan, the person named on the deed is the owner. If the house in one partner’s name, it won’t automatically pass to the partner, as it would with a married couple (via joint tenancy with rights of survivorship). It would become part of the probate estate. To remedy this, you can retitle the home, so that both partners are listed as joint owners on the deed, “with rights of survivorship.” Each partner then equally owns the house and is entitled to assume full ownership upon the death of the other. Note that there could be other factors to consider before adding a partner’s name to an existing deed, such as expenses, tax implications and protection from potential creditors. Ask your estate planning or probate attorney before you make a change. A partner owning the house, could leave it to the surviving partner in the will. Remember, though, any asset passing via the will is subject to probate, which may lead to unforeseen issues.

In addition, a partner has no legal say in his or her partner’s medical treatment, if he or she is in a situation where they can’t make decisions for themselves. To give the partner that right, partners can grant each other a durable power of attorney over health care. This allows the partner to make important health-care decisions, if the one in the hospital is unable to do so. This is different from a living will, which states a person’s wishes if they are on life support or suffer from a terminal condition. This document helps guide the agent’s decision-making. If no one is named, medical personnel must follow the instructions in that document.

Likewise, partners may want to give each other durable power of attorney for finances. This would let them handle one another’s money, including accessing accounts as necessary, if the incapacitated partner could not do so.  If the partners have dependents, name a guardian for them in the will. Otherwise, that decision will be left to the courts.

Reference: CNBC (Dec. 16, 2019) “Here’s what happens to your partner if you’re not married and you die”

What’s the Senior Freeze?

Many states and counties have what is known as a “Senior Freeze” program. This program reimburses eligible senior citizens and disabled persons for property tax or mobile home park site fee increases on their principal residence. To qualify, a senior must meet all the eligibility requirements for each year from the base year through the application year.

As far as property with a life estate, nj.com’s recent article, “Will I get the Senior Freeze if I have a life estate for my home?” explains that it’s important to determine who remains the owner of the property. The article says that the Senior Freeze program is a bit of a misnomer, because the benefit doesn’t actually “freeze” property taxes. The program actually reimburses eligible individuals for any property tax increases incurred, once an individual qualifies for the benefit.

An eligible person gets the difference between the property tax amount in the first year of eligibility—the “base year”—and the current year’s property tax amount, presuming it is higher. For example, in New Jersey, a person has to have two consecutive years of eligibility before applying and satisfy the following requirements:

• The applicant or his/her spouse are at least 65 or receiving Social Security disability benefits;
• The applicant lived in the state continuously since Dec. 31, 2007, or earlier, as a homeowner or renter;
• The applicant owned and lived in his/her home since Dec. 14, 2014 or earlier (and still owns and lives in the home);
• He or she has paid the full amount of the property taxes due; and
• The applicant meets the income limit (currently $89,013 in NJ).

The program typically doesn’t apply to vacation homes, second homes, rental properties, or properties that have more than four units.

It’s not uncommon for seniors to transfer a home to a trust for a variety of purposes including government benefit planning but conveying your home entirely may disqualify you from the Senior Freeze program. An applicant is considered the owner of the property, if she retains a life estate in the property, which must be evidenced in the deed or other legal document showing the applicant’s right to occupy the property.

The retention of a life estate will let an applicant qualify for the program if the other eligibility qualifications are met, but it could create collateral issues that risk qualification for government benefits if the property is sold. Therefore, it’s critical that you talk to a certified elder law attorney before transferring real estate or making substantial gifts.

Reference: nj.com (December 11, 2019) “Will I get the Senior Freeze if I have a life estate for my home?”

What Does an Estate Planning Attorney Really Do?

Vents Magazine’s recent article, “Understanding What an Estate Planning Attorney Does,” explains that estate planning is a legal set of instructions for your family about how to distribute your wealth and property after you die. Estate planning attorneys make sure the distribution of property happens according to the decedent’s will.

An estate planning attorney can provide legal advice on how to prepare your will after you pass away or in the event that you experience mental incapacity. She will have all the information and education on all the legal processes, beginning with your will and moving on to other important estate planning documents. She will also help you to understand estate taxes.

An estate planning attorney will also help to make certain that all of your savings and property are safe and distributed through the proper legal processes.

Estate planning attorneys can also assist with the power of attorney and health care directives. These documents allow you to designate an individual to decide issues on your behalf, in the event that you become mentally incapable of making decisions for yourself. They can also help you with a guardian who will look after your estate.

It’s important that you select the right estate planning attorney to execute the legal process, as you’ve instructed in your estate plan. You should only retain an attorney with experience in this field of law because other legal counsel won’t be able to help you with these issues—or at least, they may say they can, only to find out later that they’re not experienced in this area.

You also want to feel comfortable with your estate planning attorney because you must disclose all your life details, plans and estate issues, so she can create an estate plan that’s customized to your circumstances.

If you choose the right attorney, it will save you money in the long run. She will help you save from all the estate taxes and make all the processes smooth and easy for you and your loved ones.

Reference: Vents Magazine (December 12, 2019) “Understanding What an Estate Planning Attorney Does”

How Should Baby Boomers Claim Their Social Security?

How you handle your Social Security income has an important effect on an overall retirement financial plan. For baby boomers, employing an intelligent Social Security strategy can increase income over their lifetimes. You show know your full retirement age, coordinate the timing of benefit claims with your spouse and weigh the advantages of delaying your Social Security benefits.

Kiplinger’s recent article, “Time Claims to Maximize Social Security Benefits,” says that with more baby boomers becoming eligible for Social Security benefits, some strategies for how to claim the benefits are going away. Full retirement age is also going up, and there’s the threat of curbs to future benefits.

However, the rules for claiming retirement benefits have become a little simpler. Under a law passed in 2015, those born on or after January 2, 1954 are presumed to be applying for the highest benefit for which they qualify—regardless of whether it’s their own benefit or a spousal benefit—no matter what their age is when they claim. The law also phases out the restriction on an application for spousal benefits, which could boost a couple’s total payout by tens of thousands of dollars. However, a small group of boomers still may be eligible to use it.

These important moves can help you maximize your lifetime benefits—and help your nest egg go much further. Full retirement age (FRA)—calculated by your birth year—is on a gradual slope upward from age 66 to age 67. Social Security benefits increase monthly by a small percentage from age 62 to your full retirement age. As a result, if you err and claim at age 66 when your full retirement age is really 66½, the loss won’t be significant, but it could be permanent, decreasing your benefits for a lifetime.

The rising full retirement age for Social Security means that those who claim early will see a larger benefit reduction. For those with a full retirement age of 66, claiming at 62 permanently reduces their benefits by 25%. However, for those with a full retirement age of 67, the reduction is 30%. A higher full retirement age also decreases the bonus for people who wait to claim until age 70. Those with a full retirement age of 66, can earn up to 32% extra—or 8% a year in delayed retirement credits up to age 70. People with a full retirement age of 67 can earn up to 24% extra.

Know your exact full retirement age to understand how your benefit will be affected by claiming at different ages. All the cost-of-living adjustments are also calculated on that higher amount, so you receive the benefit of compounding.

Your FRA is also important, if you’re still working when you claim. Retiring and taking Social Security benefits are two separate decisions. You can do one without doing the other. However, if you apply for benefits before your FRA while still working, your benefits will be subject to the earnings test. Early claimers will temporarily lose $1 of benefits for every $2 of earnings above $17,640 in 2019. In the year you hit FRA, the threshold is higher—in 2019, you’d temporarily forfeit $1 of benefits for every $3 of earnings above $46,920.

But in the month that you turn FRA, the earnings test is no longer applicable. If you plan to keep working later in life, it’s typically wise to wait until FRA or later to claim benefits. If you do forfeit any benefits to the earnings test, your benefit will be adjusted upward at your FRA to replace the missing benefits over time.

Reference: Kiplinger (July 29, 2019) “Time Claims to Maximize Social Security Benefits”